Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.swaplinq.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
The Problem with Traditional AMMs
Single-source Automated Market Makers (AMMs) suffer from inherent architectural flaws for high-volume traders:- High Slippage: Large orders significantly move the price curve on a single pool.
- MEV Attacks: Predictable on-chain routing allows searchers to front-run and sandwich user transactions.
- Fragmented Yield: The best rate for BTC/ETH might be on Binance’s backend today, but Uniswap tomorrow.
The SwaplinQ Solution
SwaplinQ doesn’t rely on a single isolated order book. It acts as a master aggregator layer. When a user or API client requests a quote via the/exchange-amount endpoint, the SwaplinQ Smart Routing Engine executes a parallel fan-out query to 10+ institutional-grade providers simultaneously.
Connected Providers
View Integrated Execution Endpoints
View Integrated Execution Endpoints
Our execution pipeline is currently wired directly into the order books of:
- Binance
- KuCoin
- OKX
- ChangeNOW
- StealthEX
- SimpleSwap
- Uniswap
- PancakeSwap
- Thorchain
The 50ms Matrix
The engine normalizes the responses and ranks all viable routes in under 50 milliseconds using a strict weighted matrix:| Factor | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effective Rate | 40% | Net amount received after all routing and network fees. |
| Execution Speed | 20% | Historical average completion time of the specific provider. |
| Reliability Score | 20% | Success rate over the last 1,000 transactions on that route. |
| Liquidity Depth | 15% | Available volume at the quoted price without incurring slippage. |
| Network Congestion | 5% | Current mempool state of the target chain. |
Fallback Cascade: If the primary selected provider fails during execution, the engine automatically falls back to the next-best route seamlessly. The user (or your API implementation) never experiences a failed transaction.